Latest
Issue 9The Archive
8 essaysAbout
Who’s writing this
Twenty-five years of asking what’s at risk. Then I turned the question around.
I’m Michael Davis — trailer park to the Pentagon, with stops at Los Alamos, Boeing, and IBM along the way. Twenty-five years of doing some version of the same job: threat modeling. You look at a system and you ask three things. What does it trust by default? What is it exposing? What would it cost if that trust were broken? Then you build accordingly.
At some point I ran that assessment on myself. What does my attention trust by default? What am I exposing without ever deciding to? What would it cost if that were broken? The frameworks I’d spent twenty-five years inside had no field for any of it. Cyberpsychology did.
That’s the work now, running on both sides. At Merek Security Solutions I still do the technical half — compliance, risk, the architecture of keeping organizations safe. As a Fellow at Harvard’s Center for Digital Thriving, a doctoral candidate in cyberpsychology, and founder of MindfulBytes and the Center for Cybersecurity and Cyberpsychology Research, I work the other half: what the technology is doing to the people inside the system.
The newsletter and the podcast are where those two halves talk to each other. No productivity gospel. No panic about screens. Just an honest accounting of what this way of living costs — and what’s still available to you the moment you set the thing down.
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Founder, MindfulBytes & the CCCR
Boeing · IBM
Attention
What the feed takes, what boredom returns, and why the quiet parts matter more than the loud ones.
Identity
Who we become online, and the gap between the self we perform and the one that shows up offline.
Security
Practical safety without the fear — habits, not hardening. Your digital life reflects your mindset.
Practice
Small, repeatable ways back into the room. Nothing requiring you to delete anything.
Read it before the feed gets to you.
Join readers who’d rather think about their technology than be thought about by it.